Beauty and the Beast 2017 Review

It’s an interesting predicament I find myself in with this latest live action remake from Disney, Beauty and the Beast. Because I detested the marketing, some think I have a vendetta against the film and would never like it. On the other hand,  the animation fandom cries “traitor” if I like anything about it. Oh well! Looks like I will just have to be honest with my response as I always am. So here goes…

So far these Disney live action remakes have been a bit of a mixed bag for me. I loved Cinderella and Pete’s Dragon because they felt small and intimate and gave a new vision to the story without bastardizing the original as Maleficent did. Jungle Book I thought was solid and entertaining and the 2 Alice films I didn’t care for. Maleficent I hated with the passion of a thousand fiery suns. Where does this Beauty and the Beast lie? Well, I’d say like the remakes as a whole it is a bit of a mixed bag. The average moviegoer looking to be entertained will be but that doesn’t take from some problems I had with the film.

Let’s talk about strengths first. My favorite thing about the film was the strong production design and the large musical set pieces. I can’t think of a musical in a long time that had such satisfyingly staged musical sequences. Be Our Guest, Belle, and Gaston were the particular highlights. The costumes, scope, dancing and ensemble singing were first rate. It was easy to get swept away in the moments and that’s what you want in a musical.

I also really liked what they did with Gaston. Luke Evans was hilarious in the role and while he may not be the size of a barge it didn’t matter. He worked for the part. They made him a bit more sympathetic without completely changing his character like they did with Maleficent. He’s still the cocky guy we know and love but he seemed to actually be in love with Belle, which I appreciated. Also Lefou was a well done character. I liked his story arc through the film and Josh Gad did a good job in the role. He isn’t just a literal punching bag that he is in the animated film.  By the way, the whole “gay moment” is nothing that should offend anyone in any way. His character arc is satisfying not because of his sexuality but because of how he deals with questions of loyalty and friendship.

They also work in a lot of humor into the script, which I enjoyed. I found myself laughing quite a bit especially with Lumiere and Cogsworth but a lot of the characters were funny.

But that’s about where my positives end and some problems start. My biggest problem with the film is in the character design. All of the household objects were difficult to connect with emotionally. Lumiere and Cogsworth were designed in a way that made it difficult to see their faces and expressions. Mrs Potts was literally flat so you had no sense of movement or personality to her.  It is all left to the voice cast to sell the emotion and they just couldn’t do it. The Beast looked like Krampus and his face was flat and dull. And Harry Potter fans will hate me for saying this but I also found Emma Watson to be flat and wooden in her performance as Belle. There wasn’t much chemistry between the two of them because they were uninteresting and bland, which is a big problem selling this story.

I also had some problems with the new additions to the story. For the most part they didn’t add anything that wasn’t super obvious or predictable. It just made scenes feel stretched out and kind of boring. They should have picked one or two backstories to focus on, but instead they did a lot and none of them feel very developed or satisfyingly fleshed out. For example, we learn something about Mrs Potts’ marriage but it feels very tagged on and not emotional like it should.

The best of the additions is the new peril the household objects face with the curse but I didn’t really like that they are somehow blamed for the Beast’s behavior and the curse. This seemed like a major stretch. I can see blaming parents for the behaviors of a child but servants in a castle? That is tough to believe. It’s certainly a very harsh enchantress.  That’s for sure.

Other new story involving Belle’s mother and the Beast’s backstory just did nothing for me. Also the new songs were very forgettable and flat. They aren’t bad songs but the only reason I remember one of them is because Josh Groban sang it in the credits and I’m a huge fan of his.

Speaking of music, the other major problem I had with the movie was in the singing. Emma Watson’s singing was frankly awful. She not only sounds autotuned but her vocals don’t mesh with the rest of the strong ensemble vocals. It’s one thing for a terrible vocalist to be in Mama Mia or Phantom of the Opera but most of the singing sucked in those movies. Here the ensemble is great and classic Broadway sound, so to have an electronic sound as the lead didn’t work at all. It was such a bummer because if she had been dubbed I think I would have LOVED those songs. If I was Emma Watson I would be very mad with Disney because it is their job to make their star sound good and they didn’t.

Most people will go see Beauty and the Beast and have a great time, and so I have to give Disney credit on that level. There is entertainment to be had here and I think as a whole it is a harmless movie. Does it live up to the 1991 original film? Of course not but it’s certainly not awful. I thought the musical set pieces and Gaston/Lefou were fun enough to recommend the film despite some of my problems and issues. In a way it seems like a bit of a missed opportunity because elements  were there to make it truly great but oh well. It’s not an atrocity like Maleficent so I’m grateful for that.

Overall Grade- C+

Here is my youtube review. I would really appreciate it if you gave it a watch and a thumbs up if you have a minute.  Thanks!

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “Beauty and the Beast 2017 Review

  1. I REALLY want to see this!!
    Big Harry Potter fan and the trailers make Ella look perfect for the role but they only show the good bits in the trailer so going to see it with an open mind 😁.
    Really confused on what this “gay Moment” is that everyone is talking about!!
    Thanks for the review! 😃👏

    Liked by 2 people

  2. I’ve been anxiously awaiting to read your thoughts on this! You’re the only movie review blog I follow, so I always love coming over here to read your criticisms and praise. I will go see this regardless of the general critiques that everyone has because I love the original so much, but I’ll be on the lookout for what you mentioned. Thank you for the review!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks so much for saying that. It’s very gratifying to know what I do here is useful for great people like yourself. Thanks for reading and when you see it let me know what you think

      Like

  3. Honestly, I just saw this movie this afternoon and I love love love love loved it (I also LOVE gay Lefou), but I do agree about Emma Watson’s voice. I think her voice is very pretty, but no quite strong enough to be the lead, although I thought she was a very good actress in this role. They definitely should’ve dubbed it, because the editing is atrocious. Otherwise, though I adored this movie. Great review as always!

    -Izzy-

    sewsweetdollies.wordpress.com

    Liked by 2 people

    1. That’s so awesome. It makes me like it more if you loved it. I liked a lot about it with some problems. We definitely agree on Emma’s singing. They shouod have dubbed it. Oh well 😊

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I can’t agree that Watson’s singing is bad here, but I was occasionally distracted by the sound editing. For me, The Jungle Book is the best of these remakes and I’ll agree Maleficent is the weakest – although it gets better as it goes on (from the moment Jolie appears). I liked Beauty and the Beast, faults and all, overall. I’ve given it 4/5 in my review, but it’s only just a four for me

    Liked by 1 person

  5. This line kind of amused me: “The average moviegoer looking to be entertained will be but that doesn’t take from some problems I had with the film.”

    Does being entertained by this movie make a moviegoer average? Sounds like this will satisfy provincial audiences but not people with much more sophisticated demands of a film.

    That’s a very “Belle” thing to say. 😂😂😂😂

    Liked by 1 person

      1. I guess toss this one up to trying to explain what I think will be popular decisions that I personally just didnt love but it was flawed but average family films

        Like

  6. Thanks for sharing! I loved it but I can see why other people might not. I actually thought the voice cast did a really strong job with the Enchanted Objects – I’ve seen it 3 times and have teared up at the end every time. I enjoyed the backstory stuff added but I think that’s because I’m filling in a lot of the blanks with my own theories and stuff, whereas they are kinda just shoved in in the film and not really explained very well.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s